SOLUTIONSTracker

Business as Usual or real solutions?
Find out here:

American Clean Energy and Security Act

When Reps. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) and Ed Markey (D-Mass.) drafted their comprehensive climate bill, the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009, they knew they would need to win over industry- and coal-state Democrats.

They also knew that federal action on climate-warming greenhouse gases couldn't wait.

With President Obama in the White House and majorities in the House and Senate, the political stars were finally aligned for the U.S. to take leadership on greenhouse gas reductions. The warnings from science were getting more ominous, and the next international climate talks were approaching. If Obama hoped to lead the world toward a global treaty at Copenhagen in December, he would have to be able to hold up the promise of U.S. action.

Rather than starting with the admittedly difficult recommendations of the world's scientists, however, Waxman and Markey went straight to a compromise, a 648-page draft released on March 31 that hewed closely to the recommendations of the U.S. Climate Action Partnership, a group of big energy, industry and environmental groups.

Everything went down hill from there.

As negotiations picked up in early May, fossil fuels supporters on the House Energy and Commerce Committee demanded more concessions for their votes, quickly stripping away value from the plan. Farm state Democrats added demands in June to protect ethanol and limit EPA oversight of agriculture emissions.

The version that was sent to the House floor for a vote as early as June 26 still contained the mechanisms for reducing greenhouse gas pollution – a cap-and-trade plan, a national renewable portfolio standard, energy efficiency measures and support for technology such as smart grid development.

However, the trade-offs — those written into the draft and those that made over the following weeks to win enough votes to pass — weakened the requirements for polluters so severely that they could undermine the very point of the legislation.

 

Register or login to subscribe to updates from solve climate

Bottom Line Roundup

  • 6/26/09 - After weeks of deal making that further weakened the climate bill, Reps. Henry Waxman and Ed Markey won enough support to get their American Clean Energy and Security Act (ACES) through the U.S. House. The vote was close, 219 votes to 212. Eight Republicans joined the majority Democrats in passing the legislation; 44 mostly Midwestern and Southern Democrats, plus at least three progressives who thought the bill was too weak, voted no. The bill heads for the Senate now, where it isn't likely to be strengthened.

     

    5/21/09 - ACES Gets Thumbs Up from House Energy Committee

    After a week of debate and dozens of amendments, the House Energy and Commerce Committee voted to recommend the passage of the ACES bill. The committee vote, just before the start of the Memorial Day recess, was 33 to 25. Four Democrats voted against the bill: Reps. Mike Ross of Arkansas, John Barrow of Georgia, Charlie Melancon of Louisiana, and Jim Matheson of Utah joined all but one Republican in oppositions. Rep. Mary Bono Mack of California was the lone Republican vote in favor.

     

    5/15/09 - Waxman, Markey Formally Introduce ACES Bill

    Reps. Henry Waxman and Ed Markey formally introduced their climate bill, a watered-down version of the original after two weeks of intense negotiating with coal- and industrial-state Democrats. After reviewing the bill's offsets and allocation giveaways, Greenpeace became the first large environmental group to publicly state that it could not support the legislation as it was written.

     

    4/27/09 - Waxman Delays Markup, Dems Want More Hearings

    Rep. Henry Waxman hoped to begin marking up the climate legislation this week, but he delayed that plan after coal- and industrial-state Democrats requested more hearings. Some worry about their states' ability to meet the bill's renewable energy standards. Others want free allowances for their industries once the cap-and-trade details are worked out.

     

    4/21/09 - Week of Hearings Opens on Waxman-Markey

    The House Energy and Commerce Committee launched a marathon week of hearings on the Waxman-Markey climate bill. First up: EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson, Energy Secretary Steven Chu, and Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood. Dozens of industry officials and others, including former Vice President Al Gore, are scheduled to testify.

     

    3/31/09 - Waxman, Markey Release Draft Climate Bill

    Reps. Henry Waxman and Ed Markey released a 648-page draft of their comprehensive climate legislation. The bill, modeled after a plan from the business-environmental partnership U.S. CAP, got a lukewarm reception from other environmental groups who worried about its extensive offsets and lack of detail on how allowances from its cap-and-trade plan would be distributed.

Related Posts