Mayor Bloomberg to NY: Told You So!

Congestion pricing in New York City -- the scheme to charge a fee for driving your car into the Big Apple -- died a quiet death a few months ago. Strongly supported by Mayor Bloomberg, the idea was killed by state legislators, even though the federal government was willing to kick in $360 million to make it work.

Looks like the billionaire mayor might have been right about congestion pricing after all. The public transit system is in dire need of money, and now officials are thinking congestion pricing is the revenue source that can lead them out of enormous projected budget shortfalls.

The New York Times has an amusing story on the turn-about that includes mention of a counter-proposal for rescuing the subways and buses: a 1% increase in taxes on millionaires that would accomplish the same budgetary magic. Only in New York.

But this is no parochial story about the City That Never Sleeps alone. It's about every big city in America.

Speaking in New Orleans, Mayor Bloomberg explained why:

Congestion pricing will come, in New York and lots of other cities, because it is the only way where you were going to do the two things that you need to do: reduce people driving and find money for mass transit.

It will be interesting to see how this plays out in New York. Don't expect action until after the election -- politicians aren't going to touch this contentious issue with a ten-foot poll.

But as un-American as it seems, the days of driving where you want, when you want -- for free -- in big cities across the country are numbered.


Why not look at the root

Why not look at the root causes for congestion before we jump immediately to charging more for automobiles to enter a city? What about better timed traffic lights? How often are you sitting at a red light when there is absolutely no traffic coming from any other direction? Or addressing street parking and delivery trucks? The roads in our older major cities are so narrow and are reduced to just one lane when you have parked cars and delivery trucks taking up what could be a three lane road. The use of the roads needs to be re-imagined. Also, pedestrians cause a huge amount of delays. I'm all for a walkable city, but what about installing underpasses or pedestrian ramps. Automobiles and people CAN coexist - we just need to build (or retrofit) our cities to support that goal.

A better idea?

The usual solution is to increase density in the core urban areas to solve the congestion from commuting. If that fails to punish commuters with tarriffs.

It seems strange to me that no one considers targeted business developments as satellites to the urban core. This would greatly reduce the commute whether you used private or public transit and bring forth a substantial carbon savings.

If that makes too much sense, we could just tax the "rich" and send welfare checks to everyone else...

I agree. It makes sense.

I agree. It makes sense. There are 2 alternatives to this idea: (1) meters to only allow cars in when traffic is light. (2) do nothing. Both will keep the congestion growing, when pricing some cars out and subsidizing mass transit will work better for everyone.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <p> <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <h> <h1> <h2> <h3> <ul> <li> <ol> <b> <i>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Youtube and google video links are automatically converted into embedded videos.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Images can be added to this post.

More information about formatting options