Global Warming in the Chinese Mirror

There's a folktale called The Chinese Mirror that tells the story of a Korean peasant who returns to his village from China and brings home something no one has ever seen before: a mirror. All the villagers who look into it fail to recognize themselves, leading to all kinds of amusing misunderstandings and chaos.
Now tuck the tale in the back of your mind as you consider this disturbing news from the pages of The Washington Post. The headline: Solar Energy Firms Leave Waste Behind in China.
What an ironic, frustrating and infuriating story for anyone concerned about solutions to global warming.
The first time Li Gengxuan saw the dump trucks from the nearby factory pull into his village, he couldn't believe what happened. Stopping between the cornfields and the primary school playground, the workers dumped buckets of bubbling white liquid onto the ground. Then they turned around and drove right back through the gates of their compound without a word.
This ritual has been going on almost every day for nine months, Li and other villagers said.
In China, a country buckling with the breakneck pace of its industrial growth, such stories of environmental pollution are not uncommon. But the Luoyang Zhonggui High-Technology Co., here in the central plains of Henan Province near the Yellow River, stands out for one reason: It's a green energy company, producing polysilicon destined for solar energy panels sold around the world. But the byproduct of polysilicon production -- silicon tetrachloride -- is a highly toxic substance that poses environmental hazards.
Silicon tetrachloride can be recycled and reused in the production process, but to do so requires investment in equipment, time and expense. So it's easier to drive the stuff to an impoverished farming village and just dump it. It's a primitive solution.
Sitting back and reading this account in the Sunday morning paper in America, it was easy to jump to self-righteous conclusions, harbor opinions of superiority, and just shake our heads. If that's the outcome of a rush to supply raw materials for the global boom in photovoltaic manufacture, what's the point? If that's how China responds, we don't stand a chance. And so on.
Thank goodness for the aforementioned folk tale. How silly of us too, not to recognize ourselves in the Chinese mirror!
Is that the Love Canal I see? Or PCBs coating the bottom of the Hudson River courtesy of GE? Or one of the more than 1300 federal Superfund sites? Or communities of people of color and the poor all across the US in disproportionate proximity to toxic sites, power plants and garbage dumps?
Indeed. But blame or self-criticism are two poles of the same disease: failure to grasp the interdependent whole. All the nations of the earth are partners with China in the dumping of silicon tetrachloride -- and its exploding CO2 emissions. It is the arm of the global economic system where manufacturing is now concentrated and where environmental impacts are now especially focused.
China is where you go to get things made cheaply, where environmental regulations are a generation or two behind the developed world, where you can still get away with the crime of "externalization" to an irresistably profitable degree. Externalization is a business euphemism that conceals market failure. It's when a business -- for example through unchecked pollution -- foists the true costs of its operations on society to bear.
Li's village, for example, is paying the price the Luoyang Zhonggui High-Technology Co. should be paying for disposal of the silicon tetrachloride. And the entire earth and all the people living upon it are paying the price for the dumping of carbon into the atmosphere.
It's nauseating to read the account of the dumping of the white bubbling liquid onto the ground in China. The act is unquestionably criminal. It takes an act of honest thinking to see our own criminal reflection in the mirror it provides. Why are we not nauseated by the continued dumping of bubbling clouds of smoke into the atmosphere?
After all, is not the US responsible for the largest share by far of global warming emissions over the last 150 years? And is not the US the only nation that has refused to join the community of nation's in forging a global solution, when it should be the leader?
Back in 1989, the Better World Society -- which included Jim Henson -- broadcast a number of public service announcements. Here's one of them to help in the task of looking into the Chinese mirror.
Kermit the Frog wonders "What if everyone in the world lived in one house." It takes him 60 seconds to arrive at an answer.
(Hat tip on the video to my bride Stephanie, puppet-maven.)











Post new comment